The Socialist's False Concept Of Government Is The Child's False Concept Of The Father. by Dean Gotcher

The Socialist's False Concept Of Government Is The Child's False Concept Of The Father.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8, 9

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb.

All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, i.e., missing out on pleasure, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once they become fathers, "doing what they want to do, when they want to do it" (herein lies the false concept of the father's/Father's authority).

"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." 1 Corinthians 13:11

While dad and mom are not perfect, they may be (or may have been) down right tyrants—acting as children, i.e., "selfish" using the office of authority they occupy for their own carnal desires, i.e., pleasures, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—the office they occupy is perfect, having been given to them by God, who is perfect, in which to serve Him, teaching their children to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. A father, in the true sense of the word is a "benevolent father" loving and caring for his children while hating their doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, holding them accountable for their actions—chastening them when they do wrong, disobey, sin that they might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" and do right, obey, not sin, casting out (not putting in his will) any child who rejects his authority but not hating them, wanting to kill them as the child does when the father gets in the way of his "lust" for pleasure.

"In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy [in dialogue, i.e., 'reasoning' from your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating], nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx)

"A logical connection emerges with the anthropological perspective of the young Marx wherein 'the eye becomes the human eye, the ear the human ear.'" (Erich Fromm, Marx's Concept of Man)

"That which is Below corresponds to that which is Above, and that which is Above, corresponds to that which is Below, to accomplish the miracles of the One Thing." (The Emerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistus, translated by Dennis W. Hauck.) "The Hermetic tradition was both moderate and flexible, offering a tolerant philosophical religion, a religion of the (omnipresent) mind, a purified perception of God, the cosmos, and the self, and much positive encouragement for the spiritual seeker, all of which the student could take anywhere." (Tobias Churton The Golden Builders: Alchemists, Rosicrucian's, and the First Freemasons)

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil [that call their "self" good and the father's/Father's authority evil]; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!" Isaiah 5:20, 21

When you look at the world, your "self," and God, i.e., the father/Father from your perspective, i.e., through your eyes, i.e., through dialogue you make your "self," the world, and God, i.e., the father/Father subject to your carnal nature, i.e., subject to "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life."

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land: But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it." Isaiah 1:18-20

"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." 2 Corinthians 6:14-18

In dialogue you can do what you want when you want. In discussion you can not. The child's language is dialogue. The father's/Father's is preaching, teaching, and discussing. The father's/Father's command to the child, preventing the child from doing what he wants is sometimes (if not always) met with a "Why?" as in "Why can't I go out?" not because the child wants to enter into a discussion with the father/Father, maintaining the father's/Father's authority but because he wants to get the father/Father into a dialogue, 'liberating' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority. When the father/Father perceives the child, who is continuing to argue, i.e., refusing to obey or at least enter into discussion, i.e., questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his authority, he responds with "Because I said so," i.e., "It is written," cutting off the child's effort to get him/Him into dialogue—in order to maintain his/His authority. In a discussion, the father/Father retains his authority, i.e., he/He has the final say, i.e., "Never the less." In dialogue the child and the father/Father become "equal"—based upon "feelings," i.e., the child's (and the father's) carnal nature, what the child and the earthly father (and in the child's carnal mind the Heavenly Father) have in common—'liberating' the child (and the father/Father) from the father's/Father's authority system.

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

The soul knows by being told. The flesh by "sense experience."

In a discussion, which is formal (certain), you must suspend, as upon a cross your carnal desires, i.e., your "self," i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current stimulating and/or people are stimulating in order to hear and receive the truth, i.e., you must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will. Truth (right and wrong) is therefore objective, i.e., external to your carnal nature, making you subject (accountable) to a "higher authority" than your "self." Conversely, in dialogue, which is informal (uncertain), you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of, i.e., that inhibits or blocks dialogue, i.e., that prevents people from sharing their opinion (their "feelings") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current stimulating and/or people are stimulating, 'justifying' your "self," i.e., 'justifying' "lust" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority so you can do what you want. 'Truth' (right and wrong) is therefore subjective, i.e., subject to your carnal nature, making 'truth' subject to you, i.e., to your interpretation, i.e., to your perception, i.e., your "sense perception" of the situation, i.e., "the lust of the eyes" and your carnal desires, i.e., your "sensuous needs" of the 'moment,' i.e., "the lust of the flesh," making your "self," i.e., your "sense experience," i.e., "the pride of life" the means to knowing the truth instead of being told—sacrificing your soul upon the alter of "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," in order to get what you want, when you want it, dying in your sins.

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

"The words 'seem to' are significant; it is the perception which functions in guiding behavior." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

"Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Rogers, on becoming a person)

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words "Lust" "reconciles you to" "the world."

"According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle [the child's carnal nature]. The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the child's carnal nature, i.e., in his desire for the pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his dissatisfaction with restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority]; the foundation has to be recovered [through dialogue, i.e., by putting the child's carnal nature into practice, i.e., into social action (praxis)]." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [an environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

The problem, according to Karl Marx, et, al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do (engendering a sense of guilty, i.e., a guilty conscience in them when they do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when they "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating), getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from becoming, i.e., "actualizing" their "self," i.e., preventing 'change.' The guilty conscience, i.e., "negative valence" is a product of the father's/Father's authority, the "super-ego" of the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's "feelings." Negate the father's/Father's authority in the child's thoughts and the "negative valence," i.e., the guilty conscience "disappears."

"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves: the superego 'unites in itself the influences of the present and of the past.'" (Brown)

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)

Without "help" from outside the family, i.e., without the facilitator of 'change' creating a world of dialogue for the child, the child (out of fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or cast out, privately dialoguing with his "self" his love of pleasure and hate of restraint) will remain forever "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority system—since he is not strong enough to overcome the father/Father authority system in his "self," i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating on his own. According to Karl Marx et al., if you do not start with the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" you can not come to know the 'truth,' i.e., "actualize" your "self." This not only requires the negation of the father's/Father's authority in the child's thoughts (in his communication with his "self") but in his actions (in his communication with the world) as well, making discussion (right and wrong) subject to dialogue (to his carnal nature), 'justifying' "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated] in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"The life which he has given to the object sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) In other words, for Karl Marx et al. it is the child who 'creates' the father's/Father's authority when he humbles, denies, dies to, controls, disciplines his "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, creating an "alien and hostel" in his obedience (by faith).

"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority over the family]." "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

According to Karl Marx, et al. once the traditional family, with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth "is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family," with the Son, Jesus Christ, humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, "the former," i.e., the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father, "must then itself be destroyed," i.e., negated "in theory and in practice" ("theoretically and practically"), i.e., in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions (doing what "seems to" be "reasonable," i.e., "rational," i.e., practical to them instead of doing that which gets in the way of their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating)—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon preaching, teaching, and discussing the father's/Father's (their parent's/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. In order (as in "new" world order) for children to be their "self," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" must be 'created,' where the child's carnal nature can "rule" without parental restraint," i.e., where children can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without being held accountable for their carnal thoughts and carnal actions.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

Refusing to accept the father's/Father's authority (the system itself) all Karl Marx et al. i.e., the child can see (perceive) is the father/Father doing what he wants, when he want, not knowing the father/Father is held accountable to established commands, rules, facts, and truth himself, in God's case (being perfect), to himself. It is therefore the heart of the child, i.e., the Karl Marx in the child that Karl Marx et al. can only perceive and 'justify.'

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Your heart establishes the child's carnal nature in you, i.e., your "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Your heart is "desperately wicked" in that it hates restraint, i.e., hates the father's/Father's authority for "getting in the way," i.e. for preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates. You can not see your hate of restraint, i.e., your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the Karl Marx in you as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., your "lust," i.e., your "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug your "lust" for pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., your "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness"—which is being expressed toward the father/Father (and those who have faith in and obey him/Him), who is preventing or trying to prevent you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—as being "wicked," making you not just "wicked" but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain pleasure, keep pleasure, or get pleasure back, which includes the praises (affirmation, i.e., 'justification') of men, with you removing or attempting to remove anyone who is getting in the way.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10

No matter how much you try to 'justify' your "self" before men, seeking after and getting men's approval (affirmation), pleasing men you can not be or become "good." Only God is good. The only way you can become "good" in your eyes (and in the eyes of others) is to 'justify' your "self," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, becoming God your "self," determining right from wrong, good from evil according to your carnal nature, i.e., from your own "self," i.e., from your "sensuous needs" ("the lust of the flesh") and your "sense perception" ("the lust of the eyes"), i.e., from your "sense experiences" of this life ("the pride of life"), with pleasure being "right" and restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, getting in the way of pleasure being "wrong." All the "behavior 'scientist'" can do is "help" you actualize your "self," i.e., 'liberate' your "self," i.e., the Karl Marx in you, i.e., "lust" from the Father's authority. Question "behavior 'science'" even in the church today and you will quickly discover how intoxicated with, addicted to, and possessed by "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., Karl Marx et al. we have become—rejecting the father's/Father's authority. In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority, there is only the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," with men 'justifying' their "self," i.e., "lust," i.e., the Karl Marx in them before one another. Even to focus on the family, i.e., "build relationship upon self interest" requires the negation of the father's/Father's authority.

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels." Luke 9:23-26

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6

The socialist's false concept of government, making his "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the Karl Marx in him the personification of "the people" is the child's false concept of the father's/Father's authority, making his "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the Karl Marx in him the personification of the father's/Father's authority ("as above so below, as below so above"), 'justifying' (establishing) "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the Karl Marx in him over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, "actualizing" his "self," following, serving, protecting, promoting, praising, and worshiping the facilitator of 'change,' who makes him "feel" "good," i.e., like God, as God. Regarding right and wrong behavior, when you leave God, i.e., discussion out of your communication with your "self" and with others, moving to dialogue instead you become God. When the master facilitator of 'change' in the garden in Eden got the woman into dialogue ("nor touch it") he knew he had her, he was then able to 'create' a safe place/zone/space, i.e., a "positive" ("Ye shalt not surely die") environment where she could become God, deciding right and wrong behavior according to (in her case) her carnal nature, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, 'justifying,' i.e., actualizing her "self," with Adam (in disobedience to God) following.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12